Friday, February 25, 2011

Will A Grievous Wrong Be Righted? 150 Years Later, Will The Confederacy Rise Again?

Will A Grievous Wrong Be Righted? 150 Years Later, Will The Confederacy Rise Again?

It is rather prophetic, that exactly 150 years after the birth of the short lived by noble Confederacy, fighting for its freedom from the tyrannical Marxist Republicans who ruled the American Union (If Obama is the New Lincoln, What Should Be Expected), the conditions are again ripe for a repeat of history.

America is a pauper nation, with garages full of foreign made junk, that can not afford to any longer even feed it's bottom 15% who survive only off of the food tickets they are given. A country where one in three children live in abject poverty and hunger. A country in insane debt to every third world nation, with deficit this year alone of $1.6 TRILLION.

Yet the elite, most of whom are again in the old Union North, live with more gaiety then the Loui's court, just prior to the revolution, while the bulk of the worst poverty is in the old Confederacy. Never have bonuses in NYC been so big, larger in many cases then the amounts yearly stolen by African dictators. Furthermore, it is at this time again, that the DC elites are actively encroaching into every aspect of the lives of their peasants, with an army of bureaucrats that Lincoln and Stalin could have only dreamed about.

In Texas alone, the environmental ministry has threatened to stop the whole economic life of 46 million people, if they do not surrender full monitoring and regulation control to DC. While in many nations this is the norm as per THEIR constitutions, in the case of the Americans, it is not, it is a provincial right. After all, as a Constitutional Monarchist, the key is the contract of the constitution, in my view. Either obey what is set in it or hold a convention to change it, but why else have it otherwise? But without it, it all becomes a dictatorship.

Anger amongst Texans and the broader South is boiling over and has been simmering for the past 150 years.

But do not be fooled that the DC elites do not understand this. Is it any wonder that most of America's military bases are in the old Confederacy? Or that the elites are actively flooding the Confederacy with Latin America, to actively and efficiently delude the blood of the people living there and make them, as already has happened, a minority in their own homelands.

Thus the question arises: Will the South Rise Again? Or is it to late? Are the once proud and heroic Confederates a dead breed? Are their decedents a mere shadow of what once was?

And if, and I believe at this point this may really be a distant 'if', they do rise up again, we Russians correct an ancient wrong (Yes, the Past 100 Years Were the Fault of Russia ) and side with the Confederacy?

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Shoot the Boer? Nah, Save the Boer!

Shoot the Boer? Nah, Save the Boer!

With the likes of Bono singing songs about Shooting the Boer, in South Africa, of all places, where the savages in charge are doing just that, while the same US/UK elite who pat Albanian butchers and organ donors on the head also give a wink and a nod to the African savages murdering their most productive citizens for the colour of their skin, while running a Marxist terror state...what is one to do?

Russia has always said it is not the West, that it stands opposed to and as a counter cultural and political system to the demented West. Time to up the ante, sorta speak and show the true colour. The Boers are an oppressed white Christian people, in many ways, similar to our own Cossacks. When the Anglo British landed upon them, seeking to steal their lands as soon as gold and diamonds were discovered, 45,000 Boers, fighting on horse in hit and run tactics grounded over 400,000 British regulars. They bankrupted the British empire with that war, fighting to protect their lands. Only when the British strung barbed wire and pill boxes and took their brave men's families into concentration camps, the world's first real concentration camps, were these defenders forced to surrender.

Now, with the devolution of the West and its former colonies, into a new dark age of barbarianism, the Boers, deprived of their lands and their ability to defend themselves, are daily victims of the devil's spawn that the Western Marxists have released to curse us all.

In truth, their survival in South Africa is impossible. As South Africa rots, under ever more psychotic Marxist and Racist rule, the powers that be, with a population bathing in AIDS and violence, need victims to blame this on. In all intents, the Boers are South Africa's Jews of Nazi Germany.

Let us, the Orthodox Christian Russians, not repeat the mistakes of the past hundred years. As victims ourselves of countless Anglo Marxist machinations, let us show sympathy to these people. We have plenty of space in our huge nation. Armed and allowed to defend themselves, the Boers, it is my belief, would make an excellent and loyal border peoples to place in the North Caucuses. Further, the 1 million Boers will help to radically alter the local demographics.

The Boers as a nation should petition the Russian government for refugee status, pledging loyalty to Russia, in exchange for land.

In such a manner, there is still a chance and the message that we would be sending to the Anglos would be loud and clear, that their degenerate actions, immoral hypocrisy will have an alternative in this world.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

The Kuril Islands Solution: Joint Development with Japan

The Kuril Islands Solution: Joint Development

Let us begin with this: to both sides this is a matter of honour. Yes, the Japanese must understand that they are not the only honour bound people and equally we will not give up territory. Furthermore, on the legal front, we have the real law standing behind us proving that these islands our ours and that the Japanese had accepted as much.

In a 2005 article in The Japan Times, journalist Gregory Clark writes that official Japanese statements, maps and other documents from 1951 and the statements by the head of the U.S. delegation to the San Francisco conference, John Foster Dulles, make it clear that at the time the San Francisco Treaty was concluded in October 1951, both Japan and the United States considered the islands of Kunashiri and Etorofu to be a part of the Kuril Islands and to be covered by Article (2c) of the Treaty.[4] Clark made a similar point in a 1992 New York Times opinion column.[15] In a 2001 book, Seokwoo Lee, a Korean scholar on international law, quotes the October 19, 1951 statement in Japan's Diet by Kumao Nishimura, Director of the Treaties Bureau of the Foreign Ministry of Japan, stating that both Etorofu and Kunashiri are a part of the Kuril Islands and thus covered by Article (2c) of the San Francisco Treaty.[16]

Thus it is obvious that these were and are our territories.

Of course, the American elites stirred this controversy to make sure that first the Soviet Union and Japan and now Russia and Japan would remain enemies or at least in a cold peace. This is how the Anglos maintain power in regions, this is also why they will make sure that S.Korea can not conquer and reunify N.Korea, how else to maintain their own presence?

In 1952, the US Senate ratified a resolution that the USSR and thus Russia, had no title to the Kurils. Again, what right they had, as usual, none, but why should that stop them from the tradition of starting wars and conflicts and making money off of them?

As part of such advice and consent the Senate states that nothing the treaty [San Francisco Peace Treaty] contains is deemed to diminish or prejudice, in favor of the Soviet Union, the right, title, and interest of Japan, or the Allied Powers as defined in said treaty, in and to South Sakhalin and its adjacent islands, the Kurile Islands, the Habomai Islands, the Island of Shikotan, or any other territory, rights, or interests possessed by Japan on December 7, 1941, or to confer any right, title, or benefit therein or thereto on the Soviet Union.

The Americans spur this on, trying to maintain enemies around Russia, by stating that until a peace treaty is signed between Russia and Japan, these Islands are occupied territory. Of course they know full well that this means no peace treaty. Of course this had not stopped our development of trade and relations with the former ruling party of Japan, the Liberal Democrats. Is it any wonder that the Americans were so thrilled that Prime Minister Naoto Kan and his socialists of the Democratic Party of Japan came to power?

As with all socialists, American and British included, they have screwed the Japanese economy, making the small recovery disappear. Rotting everything they have touched and with their own popularity in collapse, they have allied with their natural friends and first cousins, the Fascists, themselves but a form of Marxism.

"Due to the spontaneous statement by Prime Minister Naoto Kan, the foreign minister's visit to Russia which followed became absolutely pointless," said Shigeru Ishiba, a leader of Japan's major opposition party, the Liberal Democratic Party.

The Kurils offer not only great fish stocks, but also off shore petroleum deposits, magnesium, titanium, and rhenium, amongst others (such as pyrite, sulfur, etc).

Thus the solution is cooperation in an exclusive economic zone for joint Japanese-Russian companies. In this way, both sides can benefit and money can flow in. If nothing else, the territories can be turned into a demilitarized buffer zone. Joint funding, joint exploitation. Upon this can be hinged further development, economic and military. In the end of things, Russia and Japan, once Japan is decoupled from Anglo vassalhood, have a lot more in common in defense, with giant China nearby, then as adversaries.

Russia is already crazy about Japanese culture, with more Soushi spots in total, then probably even in all of Japan. This is something that can and should be built upon.

But the reality is this: first, if Japan does not move and move fast, others, such as Korea and China will and are already making noises to help develop the chain and thus permanently edge out Japan.

To that the Socialists said this, proving to be amateurs:

Seiji Maehara, Japanese Foreign Minister, said, "Investment into the Northern Territories from a third country do not comply with the position of Japan, it complicates the situation. I would like to emphasize that."

And two, these talks must be held with realistic and responsible partners, not two bit, American backed amateurs, such as the ruling Socialist party. The Liberal Democrats are a prime, rational choice.

Russia? Why So Glum? All You Need is a Little Revolution!

Russia? Why So Glum? All You Need is a Little Revolution!

The Western Totalitarian Democratic media is on the war drive again, against Russia. This latest round initiated right about the time of the Arab US/UK sponsored revolutions and has only picked up steam.

Girls and boys, the American elite are not our friends, they are our enemies, with one drive since 1885, when the American-Russian Friendship Society was sponsored: to liberate us, the Russians...what they do not add is: to liberate us from our future and our wealth and from our Christian God and Orthodox Church. In other words, a future of poverty and damnation.

We had a taste of that liberation, from 1917 to 1991 and an after taste from 1991 to 1999. Thanks but no thanks. Of course, if the likes of Kasparov, Limonov, Nemtsov and others, riding illegal American monies, get into power, we will get another taste of all this, specifically the robbing of the 1920s and 1990s. These men care nothing for Russia or freedom or anything but power and money and are more than happy to sell out the whole lot of us.

By the way, since the Americans are absolute hypocrites, who ban political money in their own nation from foreigners (and who doesn't?) but ignore the same laws in every other nation, to cause revolution, poverty and mass murderer, why are we not doing the same and buying their politicians?

But back to the media. After it became obvious that the US/UK/EU were not successful in splitting the Medvedev-Putin team, they have now instead gone on the attack on Putin.

First came the deluge of articles on the "failure" of Russia to become an American/UK style Totalitarian police, what they mean, to stop terror attacks. Absolutely there are holes in our security, no doubt about it, just like absolutely there would be a lot less terror if American money, along with that of their bed mates the Saudis, Qataris and other Islamic sponsors of mass murderer, was not pouring in to pay for it. So, they pay to murder Russians and then blame Russians for not stopping it....why the typical formula for attempted regime change.

Now they are on a rampage about Putin's new palace, built with HIS money. This from the poorest debtor nation in the world, a nation whose Federal debt, now and over the next 20 years, is $58 trillion and all its assets are only $42 trillion. This does not even count in the State and city and private debt, so add another $10 trillion to that. This debtor nation that then has a president, Bush, buying $480 million helicopters (28 of them) so he and his chenovniks can fly in imperial style for 20 minutes, from the white house to the airport. A nation that has its Jihadist in Charge fly with a brigade of body guards and some 2,000 chenovniks to an Indian vacation, at the cost of $1 billion per DAY!

Where are their media on this? Easy, in a Totalitarian Democracy the media is exactly where it should be, reporting what it is told to do. It is not like the peasants mind, they know what they are told and whom to hate and to tighten their belts as they slide ever more into poverty to support the .1% who owns them.

As for our own, always be ware any who even smell of US/UK/EU money, they are traitors and whores.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Who Sponsors Terror?

Who Sponsors Terror?

With the upcoming collapse of one MidEast regime after another, the very doing of the US elites , the neocons are working hard, frothing at the mouth, to drive their base into another anti-Russian delirium.

Take this little snippet from the so called American Thinker.

It has been my longstanding assertion that Muslim terrorism is simply a false flag operation, managed in the background by our main enemies, Russia and Red China. Almost since the beginning, Muslim terrorist organizations have been supported and nurtured by the Soviet Union or its Middle Eastern surrogates.

It seems to me, that Mr James Simpson and the American "Thinker" and their thinking, are the very reason that America and because of them, the world, are in such a mess.

Well, Mr. Simpson, shall we remember who led the Arab armies into Israel in 1948, while Stalin sent tankers and fighter pilots to help the Jews? Yes, it was British and French officers.

Shall we remember who saved that bugger of small boys, Arafat and his murderers from extermination by the IDF and the Lebonese Christian Army? Yes, Reagan's marines. And who made Arafat into a world "leader"? Yes, Clinton.

And who placed Sadam into power and supported him, even as he sponsored terror? Why yes, Reagan and Bush, until it was no longer worth their efforts.

And who allowed the Islamic Republic of Iran to overthrow the Sha? Yes, Carter.

Who created the modern Islamic movement in Afghanistan that has then spread to all of the world? Why Carter and Reagan, of course. And who supported the Taliban until they protected those who attacked the US itself? Why Clinton and Bush Jr, of course.

Who sponsored the terror of the Islamics in Bosnia? Clinton again and Bush.

Who murdered Christian Serbs for Islamic Jihad and betrayed Christian Makedonians for Islamic Jihad? Who stole Christian lands and handed them to Islamic Jihadists? Why Clinton and Bush and confirmed again by the people selected Obama.

Who backed the Turks while they invaded Cyprus and murdered Christian Cypriots? Why Nixon and then Ford.

And who winked and nodded while NATO in Turkey helped train and direct the Jihad in our own Russia? Why Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush Jr and now Obama. Just listen to their media, which is wholly owned by the elites that own the whole of the country and government. Islamist rebel says he ordered Russian airport bombing

Yes, they who butcher our women and children are but misguided, yet noble rebels. But those who fought to oust an invader, the Americans, from Iraq, were all terrorists?

Then there is this media's pandering to Islamic Jihad, except it not "jihad" since it's against us Russians.

Losing to Terrorism: Putin’s get-tough policies are a disaster, as the Moscow airport bombing proves. Why are Russians so unwilling to admit it?

They bring up this little tid bit:

In September 1999, responding to a series of still unexplained apartment-house explosions that killed 293 people in Moscow and southern Russia, the Army rolled into the breakaway republic with overwhelming force. Thousands of people were killed, and thousands more were driven from their homes.

While forgetting that the West backed and Islamic Arab run Chechen Caliphate had invaded the neighboring province of Daghistan, in its Western sponsored drive for a northern Caucuses caliphate.

Still, there was little doubt that the atrocity was carried out in retaliation for Russian actions in the Caucasus—and similarly little doubt that Moscow would find targets for punishment, whether or not they were directly responsible for the airport attack.

And yet these whores are silent while their demi-god Obama massacres whole villages of Pakistanis with missile attacks to supposedly kill an insurgent or two. And this from a police state nation that invades others in its so called war on terror, while sponsoring Jihad at every opportunity.

The admission was even grimmer than people might imagine. In the wake of the September 1999 apartment-house bombings, Russian voters accepted an implicit deal with the former KGB man they quickly elected president: they would surrender many of the freedoms they had enjoyed during the chaotic Boris Yeltsin years in exchange for Putin’s protection from terrorist attacks. Confident that the state would fulfill its primary role of ensuring their safety, many Russians were only too happy to accept everything that followed: the resurrection of the Kremlin’s supremacy, the unceremonious redistribution of private wealth to government insiders, the relentless crackdown on the country’s newly independent media, and the end of local elections.

Lets see, maybe it was the fact that Putin brought stability and sanity back to the nation? Reigned in the West backed oligarchs, stopped the West backed Chechen Jihad and invasions? Made Russia from a basket case economy into the 2nd major power of Europe, projected to surpass Germany in 6 years. As for private wealth, if they are referring to the oligarchs, they were the ultimate government insiders and the ultimate treasonous bastards.

Then there is the so called Tea Party Nation, which if it is a real representation of the so called American grassroots right, we can expect nothing new but more Neocon warmongering and treachery.

Chatter from Israel, Gaza and Egypt "War is Coming":
If a revolutionary Jihadist regime takes power in Egypt, then Saudi Arabia and the Gulf emirates will not survive. In that event, the oil-rich Persian Gulf will fall into the hands of radicals who are likely to use oil as a weapon against Europe, Japan and America. Following the pattern of other revolutionary regimes, the radicals will realign their respective countries with Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela.

So, we are now, inferred as the sponsors of radical Sunni Jihad?

Again, I feel there is little hope for any kind of future of anything more then cold antagonism at best, with the Americans. We will not contend with the worst case. Sooner or later, President Medvedev will have to face that simple reality.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Step One, Starve the People

Now that you have read how the Anglo Elites plan on saving, at least temporarily, the USD: How the Muslim Brotherhood Saved the US Dollar, the average reader is now asking himself: But HOW did the Anglo Elites bring all of this around?

Humanity has only several basic needs: air, food, shelter, everything else is a want, not a need. So, obviously one can not steal or charge for the air, though governments the world over keep trying. Shelter can only be destroyed by war. That leaves food and for the oil rich, food poor nations, this is critical.

In this category fall almost all of the major oil producers: Mexico, Venezuela, Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf Princedoms, Iraq, Iran, all of Central Asia and most of sub-Saharan Africa. About the only major oil producers that can feed themselves are Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the US and the UK.

The weapon of choice, one may be surprised to learn, was initially not Finance, though that has been used to drive the final blows. The field has long been prepped by what seems to be the Noble Drive of the West: Green Economics.

In an apparent drive to save the world, the US government, back in 2006, began a series of legislatures and subsidies to create bio fuels, as a form of saving humanity from oil. The science of it all aside: a technology that uses 1.5 times more oil per liter of fuel then gasoline (due to the production cycle being driven almost all by diesel) while producing only 66% the energy of gasoline, the economics is what is important. The present rate of consumption of corn and soybean, even with massive increases in production, which itself placed higher demands on oil and thus its price, consumes almost 40% of the US corn supply. That was most of the corn the US used to export to the rest of the world.

The response, in its local neighbor, Mexico, was dramatic, driving up the price of corn meal, the main staple of most of the population, by two or three fold and thus ensuring that the internal break down of Mexico would go at full speed, as it has. This made sure that the chaos would lead to an uptick in the drug trade, and the Anglo Elites, all the way back to the Queen Pusher, Victoria the Heroine Goddess, have been dirty to their necks in drugs. This, not to mention as an additional excuse to clamp down on their own American and English populations in the "fight" against drugs.

By the way, for those foolish green goons out there, who will argue the saving graces of Ethanol, here is something to consider, as the "fuel" inevitably leaks into the environment: Ethanol is completely soluble in water, toxic to aquatic and other life forms, and there is no practical way to remove it.

After that, it was a matter of waiting, waiting for the inevitable bad harvest season that was bound to come along. That season was 2010 and it looks like 2011 will be its equal. In 2010, record heat waves wiped out much of the Russian, Ukrainian and Kazakhstani wheat crops, as well as major damage to the Chinese and Vietnamese rice crops. Add to this the wheat blight striking east Africa and Persia and a better moment could not happen. This was, almost as if, by order to the Devil. That it also corresponds right to the last gasps of the USD, was like the proverbial American cavalry charging to the rescue.

Thus, with the stage set and ripe, with headlines declaring possible food shortages, fear mongering as much as possible, the Americans and English let slip the dogs of famine, er finance, to commit the final genocidal act that would make sure the USD was saved, no matter the cost to humanity or their own people, coincidentally.

Interestingly, a little noticed study by French Scientists disproved most of this hype, thus the reason it was little noticed:

You’ll find a great deal of content on TGB regarding peak soil and the pending global food shortage, but a recent modeling study by a group of French scientists suggests that even with the world’s population expected to reach nine billion by 2050 and the need to tailor crop growing to meet environmental protection concerns, there could still be enough food to feed the world (cue music). The major issue? Richer nations will need to be more aware of waste and the global food supply chain.

And the Anglo weapon of choice? Why that very same thing that brought about the Global Collapse, First Wave, in 2007: hedge fund driven futures trading. Never has there been a more vile form of finance, really just legalized gambling at an insane level, then this.

Simply put, vultures run in, bid up the price of a commodity, passing the hot potatoe along, until the smart ones bale and the whole Anglo ponzi scheme collapses, taking whole suffering industries and nations with it, while they go home and give out billion dollar bonuses to their "top" vultures. This disrupts whole supply chains, demand patterns, production plans and thus economies. It causes massive waste in investment, by creating artificial demand, that then collapses and drive throngs of people into poverty, people who were already forced to take credits, usually from the same ghouls who created insane prices on the very things they need.

A more evil cabal of ghouls, vultures, and criminals against humanity is hard to imagine. These investors are not businessmen, they do not create anything, they do not build factories, they do not create products, they do not open markets or fill the demand of people for goods, while creating jobs and feeding their workers. They are legal globalized conmen who do the quite opposite: destroying everything they touch.

It is these vampires, the spawn of the Anglo Elites, heck many of them are Anglo Elites, who now set their eyes on food. Unable to drive up the price of oil directly, since the world economies continue to sputter after the vampire's last feeding session, they determined to use food and the panic of shortages and thus insane increases in prices, as their tool of choice.

To that end, they have bid up the price of food several fold over the past half year.

Consider this interview question with Brazilian rural activist JANAINA, a leader of Brazil's Landless Workers Movement (MST)

Q: Who benefits from the speculation?

A: The transnational corporations, which benefit from playing and speculating with hunger.

To see this, all you have to do is compare the years when food prices are on the rise and the charts showing the profits of the big transnational corporations. For example, between 2004 and 2008 we saw a series of clashes and disturbances, of hungry mobs looting supermarkets for food at the same time that prices were going up.

During that period, the profits of Syngenta, one of the world's largest agribusiness companies, soared from six to 11 billion dollars. So, while many people go hungry, corporations pocket even greater profits

The cost of food, the inability to feed one's children, were the main force behind the exploding tensions in Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Syria, Jordan and so one. However, once those fires are lit, then the radicals have an open door to walk through and take over, and through their own drives, achieve, unbeknown, what their puppeteers really want: high oil prices.

That hundreds of millions will suffer and die, is irrelevant. That their own people will be crushed by the high inflation, matters not. Heck, the Americans do not even count the rise of food in their crooked inflation counts!

We are now seeing what the face of pure evil looks like and we know it lives in NYC and London, spending it time on the exchanges.