Monday, August 2, 2010

Christianity and Holy Monarchy

What you believe about God determines what you believe about Government. A simple but very accurate thought.

St Gregory of Nazianzus's Theological Orations:
The three most ancient opinions concerning God are Anarchia, Polyarchia, and Monarchia. The first two are the sport of the children of Hellas, and may they continue to be so. For Anarchy is a thing without order; and the Rule of Many is factious, and thus anarchical, and thus disorderly. For both these tend to the same thing, namely disorder; and this to dissolution, for disorder is the first step to dissolution.

But Monarchy is that which we hold in honour. It is, however, a Monarchy that is not limited to one Person, for it is possible for Unity if at variance with itself to come into a condition of plurality; but one which is made of an equality of Nature and a Union of mind, and an identity of motion, and a convergence of its elements to unity— a thing which is impossible to the created nature— so that though numerically distinct there is no severance of Essence. Therefore Unity having from all eternity arrived by motion at Duality, found its rest in Trinity. This is what we mean by Father and Son and Holy Ghost. The Father is the Begetter and the Emitter; without passion of course, and without reference to time, and not in a corporeal manner. The Son is the Begotten, and the Holy Ghost the Emission..


Least we forget, the crowning of a monarch is a minor sacrament of the Church and for good reason, as it bound the Monarchy to the service of God and Church, to the moral upholding of Society, for which, he would answer before Him who judges all mankind, even the Western Man-Gods.

Monarchy, through its ties to God and Holy Tradition reminds humanity, that even the most powerful being of the state are duty bound before the Creator and always and in everything answerable to him. The cheapness of Republicanism and the absolute gutterness of Democracism shows the world the view of the hollow critic, ones who have nothing constructive to offer on the relationship of Man and God and indeed have only destruction of that relationship in their sites, as it is a brake upon their quest for all power all the time.

It was Solomon, himself, who had ask God only for Wisdom and through that Gift was given so much more, who warned all the kings of the world, the vast majority of whom were pagan, that they were placed upon the throne by a Living-God, who will judge them for have done and what they have failed to do. Equally is a Monarchy judged by the actions of his people, for he is their father.

The down fall of Holy Monarchy and thus humanity's close relationship with God, and equally the rise of atheistic evil and Islamic Jihadist rampages, can be traced directly back to the Enlightenment, which separated faith and religion from politics and power. It gave license for true tyranny, by relying on logic, but a logic easily malleable to one's whims, rather than Holy Tradition.

To take it further, this was the birth of the separation of Church and State, which has born fully its poisonous fruit in the Western World. As stated in Mathews 7:17-20
"Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, and a rotten tree cannot produce good fruit.Every tree that doesn't produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into a fire. So by their fruit you will know them." and again in Mathews 12:33 ""Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree rotten and its fruit rotten, because a tree is known by its fruit." Finally there is the warning of Mathews 7:21 "Not everyone who keeps saying to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will get into the kingdom of heaven, but only the person who keeps doing the will of my Father in heaven."

Thus the rottenness inherent in Republicanism and Democracism makes the men of its state, those who are the fruit of the rotting true, equally cruel, evil, loath to worship something greater then themselves or to sacrifice themselves to something greater. Thus only the fire awaits those nations who followed the corruption of sponsored and brought forth by the Enlightenment.

To combat these basic truths, the Left, those bastard great-great-great-great children of the Enlightenment, in an endless effort at "creative" destruction, and thus the service of the Devil, constantly state that "In this day and age, these types of ideas are inappropriate." One could equally say that about the failed and ever failing Republicanism, leading to Democracism and then to Communism/Facism of Marxism. But those failures are ignored and only Holy Monarchy is ever endlessly attacked. Holy Monarchy's biggest weakness in the face of these bastards of the Enlightenment was its faith, as if one reads the true histories, the punishments of the bastards were usually humane, while the bastards' actions were ever the flowing of blood in rivers, sacrifices to the Satan they worship.

A prime example is the sentencing of Lenin and Stalin to exile in Siberia, where both were bound to a village, though allowed to write letters and accept visitors. From the propaganda of the Americans and the other Marxists, one would think that the Holy Tsar had drawn and quartered these two satanic bastards. But indeed, it was these bastards and hundreds of thousands of others, backed by Anglo cash, who did the drawing and quartering of hundreds of millions of humans, from Soviet Russia, to Nazi Germany, to Fascist Italy or Moest Communist China and dozens of others.

The propaganda of the Enlightenment and its generations of bastards that followed and continue to follow, was to brainwash the people of the West into believing that all of these evils are just part of living in the modern world.

Of course, the Left will point out, and rightly so, that many monarchies were cruel or tyranical. That is of course true. However, the most vile is a mere shadow in comparison to the greatest sons of the Enlightenment: Calvin, Cromwell, Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Hitler, Goebbels, Moa and many others. Furthermore, they kept a much better level of stability and justice than any dictator of the Enlightenment. Further, in a Holy Monarchy, the ruler, appointed by God, is constantly reminded of that fact by the Church and of his duties before the God that made him and the people he was set over and it is the duty of the Christians, the Church to do just that, thus steering the Monarchy on the right path when he errs. In the Modern Republicanism/Democracism there is no such thing, as the seperation of Church and State is a holy "right", thus no one to dictate which way things are to go.

Even the Americans, who will claim that their founders, many of whom were cultist Masons, were moved by God, or rather the Calvinist heretical and Enlightenment inspired Republicanism, were basing their republic upon God. What little base there was, was removed when the 40,000+ branches of Protestantism accepted tax-exemption status for enforcing the separation from their side. In effect, they sealed the Devil's deal for silver, Judases every last one.

Monarchy reminds us once and for all, that power, justice and mercy, those traits that are paramount to a righteous government, and almost always missing in all Western regimes, comes not from men but only from God and none others. Further, unlike some paper constitution of a Republican regime, that is promptly ignored by follow on generations, the bond of the Monarchy to God through the Church, the Holy Tradition and the People, is ever renewed and ever kept alive, as no abstract idea or piece of paper ever will, once the memory of its writers are gone.

Thus is it ever that the loudest ridicule of true Holy Monarchy comes from the very Western bastards of the Enlightenment who are most tyrannical in their own self-worth and expulsion of God.

The relationship was best summarized by Lev Regelson, on his site Knol: CHURCH AND MONARCHY IN RUSSIA

The Tsar is the head of state, who is called upon to reconcile conflicting interests and demands – individual, personal, group, class, national and religious. The Tsar uses his power in exceptional and extraordinary situations, when agreement cannot be reached without his intervention. The more organic and spontaneous popular life, the less need there is for this intervention. The Tsar is a symbol of national unity: by praying that the Tsar be given the spirit of reason and strength, the whole nation helps the Tsar to govern it, shares the burden of government with him to acquire the Divine Grace and Divine Energy necessary to rule the State.

15 comments:

petkov said...

wow, you are in a dire need of processional mental help, man. I suggest you seek one as soon as possible.
Just to show you how wrong you are I will point that Stalin saved your ass from the Germans; without him, you'd be speaking German now.
The rest of the article is just some crazy shit. You put down enlightenment movement? Yeah, I bet you would love living the the Middle Ages under the rule of the church and King.
Good luck with your therapy. Keep us posted how it goes.

Adolfo Giurfa said...

When will Russia reestablish monarchy as an example to the world?

tesla1389 said...

Stas,

That quote by St Gregory the Theologian is one of my favorites.

Cobra said...

Early 20th Century Russian wonderful pictures.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/captured/2009/10/21/color-photography-from-russian-in-the-early-1900s/?source=ARK_plog

barry said...

These old writers were light years ahead of the 'modern' scribblers.Hopefully the Putin miracle is a prototype for a 21st century type Monarchy. Petkov re Stalin saving Russia from the Germans:Stalin wanted to invade Europe but Hitler beat him to the punch. Which is why all through summer 1941 one Soviet attack army after another was bypassed and surrounded.Stalins response ? Panic , seclusion and indecision.It was only when he allowed the old pre-revolution precepts back that the Army found its feet . He bacame 'Tsar' to the people and they responded with an amazing comeback only to be betrayed again post 'victory'

jack said...

@barry

Suvorovs “Icebreaker” nonsense has been debunked by every credible historian who has searched both German and Russian military archive including

Field Marshall Eric von Manstein who commanded the 56th Panzer Corps of Army Group North wrote in his book “Lost Victories” the German military deemed Soviet position as defensive.

http://www.metafilter.com/85023/Viktor-Suvorov-on-the-beginnings-of-World-War-II

barry said...

@Jack I was thinking more of Joachim Hoffmans 'Stalins War of Extermination'.Of course the German/Mannsteins view of Soviet forces was a defensive one about 2 minutes after the invasion.I guess the 40 yr occupation of Eastern Europe was a figment of our imaginations?Also what is a credible historian? Those hacks in western 'acedemia'who dont know one word of Russian

Bob said...

@petkov...Really stupid comment. Stalin saved no ones ass but his own. Only thing Stalin did was hide under his bed while the Russian Orthodox Church supplied the manpower to defeat Hitler.

jack said...

@barry

Those who have actually studied the Soviet archives in depth as Mr Hoffman probably using the same one-sided bias sources as all main stream historians which tend to be nationalistic and affiliated with western Universities and financed by political think tanks and organisations.

One of the best historians on Russian military during WW2 is Colonel David M. Glantz who fought in the Vietnam war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Glantz

Main stream historians can't even read the text of the M-R pact properly which was not an agreement to partition Poland which says nothing of the sort in the agreement and specifically references in the text a “sphere of influence” which the USSR entered Eastern Poland after the Polish government fled abroad to neighbouring Romania.

There are people in Russia who held a press conference claiming that during the Yeltsin regime they were given material to produce forged documents and insert them into the Soviet archives.

Communist era research today is conducted by the CIA through NED funded Memorial.

Germany and Poland secretly allied within the 30’s to attack the USSR and in 1938 aligned with British and French intelligence creating an organisation called Pometey set up in Paris with its objective to spark separatism and annex Ukraine, Belarus and the Caucasus and push the USSR’s boundaries beyond the Volga river.

http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-01/poland-destruction-ussr-ww2.html

The 40 year occupation was due to the fact like the reason behind WW2 Britain and the US were supporting Nazi affiliated nationalist groups recruited towards the end of WW2 to attack the USSR and use states like the Czech Rep to launch attacks on Ukraine to gain control of Eurasia which is were we are now. All the governments of the former USSR like the Baltic States and the Orange junta in Ukraine are these former Nazi affiliated groups with Yuchenko’s wife is a Bandera member affiliated with the Neocons in the Reagan administration.

You can blame the creation on post WW2 Soviet Union on Mr Churchill and Britain first by helping to create WW2 then launching the Cold War.

jack said...

@barry

Those who have actually studied the Soviet archives in depth as Mr Hoffman probably using the same one-sided bias sources as all main stream historians which tend to be nationalistic and affiliated with western Universities and financed by political think tanks and organisations.

One of the best historians on Russian military during WW2 is Colonel David M. Glantz who fought in the Vietnam war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Glantz

Main stream historians can't even read the text of the M-R pact properly which was not an agreement to partition Poland which says nothing of the sort in the agreement and specifically references in the text a “sphere of influence” which the USSR entered Eastern Poland after the Polish government fled abroad to neighbouring Romania.

There are people in Russia who held a press conference claiming that during the Yeltsin regime they were given material to produce forged documents and insert them into the Soviet archives.

Communist era research today is conducted by the CIA through NED funded Memorial.

Germany and Poland secretly allied within the 30’s to attack the USSR and in 1938 aligned with British and French intelligence creating an organisation called Pometey set up in Paris with its objective to spark separatism and annex Ukraine, Belarus and the Caucasus and push the USSR’s boundaries beyond the Volga river.

http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-01/poland-destruction-ussr-ww2.html

The 40 year occupation was due to the fact like the reason behind WW2 Britain and the US were supporting Nazi affiliated nationalist groups recruited towards the end of WW2 to attack the USSR and use states like the Czech Rep to launch attacks on Ukraine to gain control of Eurasia which is were we are now. All the governments of the former USSR like the Baltic States and the Orange junta in Ukraine are these former Nazi affiliated groups with Yuchenko’s wife is a Bandera member affiliated with the Neocons in the Reagan administration.

You can blame the creation on post WW2 Soviet Union on Mr Churchill and Britain first by helping to create WW2 then launching the Cold War.

Gregor said...

hehe, whether or not you agree with Petkov, you have to admit he has panache.

Incidentally, I do agree with you on this one Stas. But to play the Bolsho-Marxists at their own game: 'What is to be done?'

Almost all of the Royal Lines in Europe seem to be extinguished. Furthermore, I think here in Britain we should have a Stuart monarch, but I think this would create friction.

jack said...

@barry

The 40 year occupation was due to the fact like the reason behind WW2 Britain and the US were supporting Nazi affiliated nationalist groups recruited towards the end of WW2 to attack the USSR and use states like the Czech Rep to launch attacks on Ukraine to gain control of Eurasia which is were we are now. All the governments of the former USSR like the Baltic States and the Orange junta in Ukraine are these former Nazi affiliated groups with Yuchenko’s wife is a Bandera member affiliated with the Neocons in the Reagan administration.

You can blame the creation on post WW2 Soviet Union on Mr Churchill and Britain first by helping to create WW2 then launching the Cold War.

vonbach said...

I'm fine with a monarchy. I'd rather see one person and his advisors in charge of a country rather than a political whore.

barry said...

@Jack Everything you say is true. However I try to look at conflicts from both sides, whether in geopolitcs/history or among my friends/ relations. It doesnt matter if Hitler or Stalin were worse:they were both devils.Also scholarship is advanced by reading as many commentators as possible not hewing to pet authors.

jack said...

@barry

True but they use the false narrative of Nazism and Communism to strengthen the US lead NWO negating the fact that both came to power with US, British, French, etc backing and created the condition for with both ideologies came to power and seized control especially the so called “Russian” revolution.

The way I see it is that Britain and France and interests in the US wanted to control strategic oil and gas energy spheres in Eurasia in the North Caucasus and Siberia like today and also wanted to eliminate Germany from becoming a regional power player independent of Britain so they engineered WW2 hoping to eliminate each other in a war of attrition.

It was revealed last year that Mussolini was a British intelligence asset since WW1.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy

You’re never “once” or a “former” British intelligence agent just like former UN representative Lord Paddy Ashdown in Bosnia.