All great nations, in order to win their civilizational battles for survival, must offer the world an ideological ideal of one sort or another. This has always been true and has raised many civilizations to immortal glory or infamy, depending on the success or failure of that ideology. Simply to "be", to survive in this world, to hang on, will hamper any nation, as other more robust civilizations with a clear message pull away the youth and talent, cause havoc and unrest and eventually either absorb, decimate or force the emulation of the foreign creed.
This was always understood in Russia, from the ancient Muscovy state, through the Soviet Union, but this idea has been lost in modern Russia. It is understandable that those throwing off the yoke of the Soviet state wished to rid themselves of all things Soviet. However, national ideology was not a Soviet invention and dropping it has been very detrimental to Russian society and Russian interests abroad. For the majority of the past 17 years, Russian youth has Westernized, rejecting their own language, heritage and culture. Foreign and alien faiths, that have never been in Russia, have sprouted up like weeds. Russia's citizens have fled the country, lacking anything to believe in and society as a whole has suffered. Abroad, former allies have lost hope and lost the guiding light, flocking to what appears the stronger message, the stronger civilization: Anglo-Marxism. Only recently have things started to inch back.
With no alternative to the US/British Anglo-Marxism, a blending of Trotskyte Fascism and Liberalism Theology, Russia watched as one ally after another toppled under the Anglo-Marxist intrigues or veered towards them out of their own desires, even as Russia's own culture was corrupted. Thus the Uni-Polar New World Order.
It is time to say "ENOUGH", it is time for Russia to reach into its soul, to reach into its past, to find an adequate ideology to rally around. Simply to say, "we are not like them" or "We believe in international law" is not good enough, for a world power like Russia.
Even as we speak, the collapse of the Neo-Trotskyte Fascism aka Anglo-Marxism, is collapsing under the weight of its own corruption, greed and evil. It is taking along with it, it's bastard children: atheism, nihilism, and post modernism. These death throws give Russia an opportunity, to either stand upon its own ideological legs, to fall along into the vortex of destruction that the Anglo-Marxists have created for themselves and those around them.
As I will remind you, dear reader, the first of the modern "ism" revolutions started with the Jacobites of the French Revolution and than sputtered on along to the Anglo-Marxist financed Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. The financiers of that revolution, Wall Street, was already infected by Marxism and those not infected by Marx were infected by Mammon. This of course split into the bureaucratic Stalinist Communism and the Corporate-State Trotskyte Fascism. Militant Fascism died on the battle fields of 1945 Europe, but a mutant version of it, a neo-Trotskyte Fascism survived and infected what is now the Anglo-Marxist sphere and to a lesser degree the rest of Europe. With it's hand maidens of Liberal Democracy and Globalization, code words for Fascist Marxism, economic slavery and exploitation, it was kept somewhat in check by the Cold War and its parent's old family rival, Stalinist Communism.
With the fall of Stalinist Communism in 1991, there was no longer any need for the Anglo-Marxists to act or pretend to control themselves. In their "End of History", they charged forth to infect and exploit the rest of the world. Alas for them and those carried off by their swan song, Anglo-Marxism is Marxism and thus carries the tumor of its own destruction in its breast. The faster Globalization grew, the quicker the tumor spread and went critical.
Russia must resist this vortex of death and destruction and must offer it's historic allies an alternative to the mass suicide that is happening even as you read this, a slow mass cultural and societal suicide, sped up by the Bank Panic of 2008 and the Economic Collapse of 2009. She can only do this by building a new ideology rooted in the old defense of the old, traditional Orthodox Christian beliefs and world view. Russia must step forward again as the Defender of the Orthodox Christian faith and as the champion of all Christianity under the yoke of Islam.
Russia must show herself as the bedrock of stability, upon which the restless, moraless Anglo-Marxist world will crash and break. She must be the guide to the rest of the Orthodox Christian world and to others willing to join her.
To do otherwise is to commit suicide.
Owner: Stanislav Mishin at stas.mishin71@gmail.com
"Whosoever shall come to us with the sword shall perish by it. Upon this stood and stands the land of Russia".
St Prince Alexander Nevsky, in the 13th century
Romans 8:31
10 comments:
Stop it with that ridiculous 'Ango-Marxism" term you have made up. It's silly and ludicrous but doesn't mean anything.
The natural state of man/humanity is community i.e. communism. Just because the US and other so called "capitalist" countries actively fought against communism and wouldn't let it compete on the world market and brought it fall (in some places) doesn't mean communism is out or has been discredited as a theory or practice.
Sure, the USA, UK and so on are blatantly giving million no billions o their pals who are running the banks(after all they all belong to the same club) doesn't make their actions Marxist.
Other that that Anglo Marxist term you got a fine very good blog.
Thank you for the compliment on the blog, I do have a problem with the communism statement. Communism is not natural, never has been.
The natural state of man/humanity is community i.e. communism.
Communism goes all the way back to when...? Oh, the mid 1800s and has been a success in how many nations? None.
wouldn't let it compete on the world market and brought it fall (in some places)
Communism fell because it 1. goes against human nature. Do you not remember the Russian joke: You pretend to pay us, we pretend to work?
If all are equally rewarded, there is no incentive to push forward.
2. Marx had no knowledge of economics, when he made up his stupidity that has destroyed nations. The market is the only thing that can set prices for goods and labor. If it is the worker/plant that sets the price, it can only be done by a monopoly or state monopoly, thus no freedom, no efficiency, no survival.
Hitler's invasion is the only thing that let Soviet Communism last to 1991, when we found out that living n the richest nation in the world, we were not the world middle class but the world's poor. Those were not NATO tanks in Moscow streets, those were Russians.
Stanislav, you are a breath of fresh air; a Russian who understands Austrian school economics.
Your "Anglo-Marxist" assessment of EUrope, also known as Eurabia, and the U.S. is quite accurate. Since I am a U.S. citizen and understand both economics and the Marxist infection, it is with dismay that I watch the country of my birth crash and burn.
Interestingly, statism cum socialist policies visited America before her constitution. Alexander Hamilton wanted big government powers included in our constitution and scant years later founded our first central bank, the U.S. Bank. However, congress did not renew its charter. Not till the formation of the Federal Reserve did the destructive central bank return.
Hamilton was a pure elitist who wanted heavy taxation where it benefited his comrades.
Now, with an arrogant neo-Marxist dupe at the helm of the U.S. we may not survive. Those of us who recognize the path we're on are too few and have little time left. And most of the younger generation have been spoon-fed by state (union)-controlled education and a big media where truth has become Orwellian new-speak.
Off topic: My maternal grandfather was a Russian coal miner who left in 1905 before the Bolshevik revolution cut Russia's throat.
Thank you for the comments, it is always good to be appreciated. :) I do have to make one correction: the US central bank did not come back with the Federal Reserve but with Lincoln the Red, who also instrumented your first income tax and monetization of the economy by creating one of the "modern" world's first fiat currencies to pay for Civil War with....now it went away after but during he used it. He also threw 38,000 yankees in jail: everyone who disagreed with him, even the mayor of Baltimore, half the Maryland state legislature and had an arrest warrent for the chief justice (which was never carried out).
Stanislav: Yes, you are correct about Lincoln's counterfeiting operation in order to fund his war.
We should also note that Lincoln only freed the slaves in the states that seceded from the union, a meaningless gesture considering he no longer held jurisdiction over them. Slaves of the union states still remained property of others.
We should also note that Lincoln only freed the slaves in the states that seceded from the union, a meaningless gesture considering he no longer held jurisdiction over them.
Worse than that, he only freed slaves in rebelling states/territories not already under control of the Union. I am writing a new article on Obamma and his Lincoln idol, so have been doing much research lately on it.
I'll look forward to the Obama article. His, or I should say 'his handler's' attempts to create the Obama Lincoln brand would be quite laughable were it not for the willful ignorance of the average American.
Hmmm with regard to that "Petrov" fellow and his dislike of the "Anglo-Marxist" moniker. I heard a similar term from the "Nazi Rubber Duck" on youtube. A rubber duck with an SS cap presented Globalisation as a reformation of Marxism with market capitalism. It was quite a good exposition - for a rubber duck.
I simply do not understand your lack of knowlege concerning American history. The United States is a blend of left and right wing ideologies. Economic hardship is nothing new, and I am certain America has enough flexibility to endure.
What can Russia offer other than what it gave German soldiers:Frozen rectums.
America is not a 'blend of left and right wing' ideologies. The only stronghold of 'rightism' whichever existed was crushed by 1865.
Like Stanislav has said elsewhere on this blog, the Republicans are just the 'not quite as hard left' version of the Democrats. And I'd add that they also serve a sort of 'rearguard' function by purging their ranks of any real right-wing ideology that shows up in their party (paleocons, etc)
Post a Comment