Where is the Butt?

And on a different note, than I usually take, I would like, dear readers, to approach a question that has long bothered me, with no answer and I fear that in this prose, I will again not give an answer, as I have none, but I will pose the delima.

In my various travels to the West, particularly the Anglo West, I have noticed something very peculiar, about the Butt. No, not that many are as wide as a school child's table or that some have flesh, as seen at the beaches, that looks like rutted asphalt, all bumpy and wavy. No, it is something much more puzzling and maybe a key to explaining the dour character that is a trait of the Anglos, almost as much as horse teeth amongst the British: the question, dear reader is this: where is the Butt?

What do I mean by this? Simple, if one looks at the Anglos, one can not help but notice that about one in four white Americans and about every second or third Brit has no Butt. That is correct, absolutely nothing. The pants hand there, as if a butcher had come by and simply chopped it off. It is something to see an otherwise attractive woman missing her posterior. It just feels wrong, like a ripple in the universe, as if to say, no, this is not reality but a mutated alternate dimension.

After all, how could people not have Butts?

Sure, it must be a genetic trait and obviously from its prevalence, a rather strong one, though one restricted mostly to western Germans and on through to the British isles and the descendants of the British in other lands. You will not find it in most other places, not amongst other Europeans, nor Africans or Latins. Sure, some Chinese have no Butt, but those are usually flat all over and have a figure of a board anyways, so some how that is not as striking.

But that again brings us back to character and national personality. Now we all know that Anglos are dour, serious folk, ever so tame on emotion and in control, except when they drink like fishes and fight. So, could this be because of the Butt or rather there lack off?

Follow me on this: if one has no Butt, than what does one sit on? Sure one sits on the back end, what else? But with no Butt, there is no cushion of muscle and fat and thus one can only suppose that these misfortunates sit directly on their bones, their leg, hip and back bones. Surely, this can not in any sense be comfortable. Surely? So, maybe this lack of Butt is what has been such a determining factor in the Anglo behavior and dourness?

Just food for Butt...er...thought.