All around us, on a daily basis, we are surrounded by the wrecks and failures of the modern liberal state. Empty or half filled promises, grown on the backs and suffering of a degraded peasantry. What began with the American masonic revolution of 1776 and sputtered on and off in Europe and the world through the 1800s, taking firm hold in the 1900s, first as a pseudo republicanism, than as war fascism, communism and socially liberal corporate capitalism (aka modern democracy or rather corporate-state fascism) has brought us endless wars, cultural destruction (as Americans like to call it: destructive creativity), moral depredation, spiritual death and a society of angry, childless, degraded, shamed and spineless Caucasians of every European stripe, up to their ears in meaningless things, without the stable families, children or friends to enjoy them with. This in short, is the modern version of success: crime, death, despair, loneliness, Godlessness and no moral or spiritual purpose of being, outside that of a worker ant.
In short; the anti traditionalism, anti Church and thus Anti Monarchist society of the new liberal (wym)myn of the 1900s and early 2000s is dieing, bringing with its demise an ever quickening decline into a soulless, Godless, poverty and state barbarianism, where the value of the the life of a piss ant peasant (that would be 98% of you) is only valued in how it serves the state and the 2% Alpha population leading their own Godless, valueless and deprived lives. In other words: all you modernisms are nothing but the bowl movement waste products of the Devil to whom the West as a whole is ever more on its knees groveling, like a drug addict suffering withdrawal before the likes of his drug seller master.
Now compare this to the majority of the monarchies of the end of the pre World War One age. Not the propaganda spewed by the endless line of new Liberalism's propagandists but to actual fact. To do this, we must tear away the propaganda of the liberals, specifically the Americans and the Wall Street uber machine of Christless profit at any and all costs. Furthermore, we must pull away the veil of the daily miseries that were in no way the fault of the monarchies in specific and their societies but were suffered equally in America and other areas due to a lack of technology that would have come along regardless, to remove them from the human experience.
Monarchies and monarchistic societies of the 1800s and the early 1900s were on average stable, content and purpose driven societies. People born into them were assured of a world order in which they had a place, in which they could move up or down by their own hands, steadily if not quickly, but in which they were relatively sure that stability and sanity would reign as assuredly as the sun would rise and settle. In almost all of them, they were also assured of a steady conservative but undeniable improvement in their lives.
In Russia, for example, under Catherin the Great, the first worker rights laws were passed in Europe, forbidding child night labour and women and children from working in dangerous state enterprises, such as mines and munitions plants.
Economies were also stable, with few major bubbles and little loose monetary policy. The most famous exception of this was the Spanish monarchy after getting its hands upon the South American gold. Spending with abandon and collapsing its economy. Coincidentally, they also practiced the first real instance of Free Trade, allowing most of their goods to be produced outside of their economy and imported in. Of course it worked just as well in the 1600s as it did in the 1900s and 2000s, in other words, an abject failure. After its economic collapse, sanity and mercantilism returned quickly.
Another famous example is France during the American Masonic Revolution. The Masonists convinced the French king to leverage France dangerously to sponsor their revolution, a move that only fed the revolutionary elements in France. In return, France, besides being able to stab long time foe England, would also get exclusive trade rights with the Americans, which would more than repay their leverage.
The American colonies, which were out of ammunition, supplies, uniforms, canon, rifles and hope, were replenished with everything they needed, including fighting men and a real navy, ala France.
In exchange for their aid, the French were backstabbing by the American Masons, more concern with profit and revolution rather than honor, when they ran to the British and singed a separate piece from their allies, giving the English exclusive trading rights.
This, of course, led to the bankruptcy of the French government and the French Revolution, also on Masonic lines, which descended into immorality and tyranny, under the liberal Robespierre. Surely, this was seen as a great victory to Washington's Masons and a profit to boot, as Washington than refused to pay back any of its French loans that were made by the king. See Phony War, which was a raiding war that lasted for quite a while after this.
As a matter of fact, most monarchies were based upon mercantialistic economic models, placing the well being of their peoples and nation as well as assuring value producing employment for their people, as their primary priorities. Even Masonic Americans followed this policy initially, a lingering left over from their days under the reign of English kings. Unfortunately, the further they got away from this, the more liberal they became as newer generations no longer had a cultural memory of the monarchist days and Masonic "creative" destruction drove them to the Christless ideology of profit at all and any cost.
Look at the Weimer Republic, for a prime example Removing the conservative kaiser and his crrcle, the new liberals in a hyper rush to liberalization and blaming everything conservative and thus evil on the Kaiser, in turn devalued and debased German culture into a nihilistic, superficial society, with almost the same speed as they devalued the Deutsch mark from a leading world currency into an international joke, fit only for heating ovens, in large stacks. Of course the end result of all this neo-liberal debasement is the coming of a vegetarian, animal rightest, anti-smoking, anti drinking tyrant, surrounded by homosexuals, drug addicts and child molesters, in the name of Adolf Hitler and his campaign of "HOPE and CHANGE!".
It is with a saddened heart that I must remember that we Russians even beat the Germans with the speed of our own debasement as led first by Alexander Kerensky and his Labour Party and their Cadet Party allies and than by Lenin and his Marxists, all sponsored by the masonic American elites, through Wall Street and the American State Department, coincidentally, the same types who than brought Hitler to power and other neo-liberal fascists, throughout Europe. Interestingly, Kerensky's father was also Vladimir Lenin's school teacher and the two families were close.
Monarchies provide stability to both economic and social aspects of their societies, by their very nature. As a patriarchal society, based on a furling family, they elevate the nuclear family to the center point of all that is culturally good and holy. The evils of abortion, immorality, homosexuality, crimes of perversion and even out of wed lock births as well as the present sky rocketing social violence, only began to appear in societies as the monarch was removed and society moved away from its roots, in the direction of liberalism, retaining only the dim memory that things were once better before, but not of the reasons why.
Another key of this is tradition, a cultural norm that binds the actions of the king, the elites and the peasantry and everyone between and thus lends a societal norm in which a person can prosper without the paranoia and insecurity of the modern man and his dieing state built upon humanism.
Traditional societies also function better in business, requiring fewer lawyers, as agreements verbal or written are expected to be honoured in spirit as well as word and a man's word is worth his weight in gold. There is also less back stabbing and covering one's back as lines of command and responsibility are direct, established and clear, everyone knowing upon whom responsibility will land.
Of course, religion always played a very dominant roll, specifically the Christian faith that reminded the monarch that his actions and that of his people were and are always answerable before the Supreme Judge and His Judgment, something all together missing in the Liberal Dieing West built upon Humanism or Man Is God theology. Thus, God is a mediating effect gone from modern politics even if the politicians occasionally visit churches for photo ops. Prime Minister Putin seems to be the rare exception, a man of actual strong faith in Christ.
The Church provides a frame work of morality, controlling the excesses of human nature. God being the King of the Kingdom of Heaven provides a frame work and justification to the government, other than the whims of the masses or the power elites. The Church also provides the people a purpose in life, greater than the self or mere survival, while assuring the people of their place in the after life.
Liberal humanism, that was meant to replace God, by the Liberals, who ousted the marches, has done none of this. Instead, the more "humane" the goals, the more "liberating" its philosophy, the more barbaric, animalistic and Luciderian its results and products, leaving humanity not masters of their own destiny but as little more than sadistic, paranoid and self loathing intelligent apes, slaves to their animal desires and the whims of the moralless top 2%.
Under a monarch, societies also had a strong, historic and optimistic self view. Some of the greatest architectural and scientific achievements came fro these societies. Societies that were not ripped apart by multiculturalism, even when other cultures and races inhabited the state, there was always one dominant culture everyone aspired to.
Even in the post colonial Africa, the locals adhere as strongly to the old Imperial culture and languages, as their own organic. The educated masses (or rather the thin layer) even more so. I have had several educated Negro Africans tell me flatly, that they wished the old imperial powers would return. But those old cultures are dead or dieing in their own homelands, what can they possibly return to?
While a monarchy is not the cure all for a society's ills, it does provide the critical stability and frame work to achieve the needed cures.
So, Monarchists, carpi deum, as liberalism falls all around us, dieing and dragging humanity into the grave, with it. It is time for us to step forward and bring that old time, but sound and true idea back into the world's norm.
