NATO's Future is In Russia's Hands

NATO a hodgepodge organization of states in Europe, Asia (Turkey) and North America who have no overall mission, the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact long dead, are a fragile institution with many short comings for the members and gains only for the Anglo Sphere.

Since the Soviet collapse, NATO (US/UK and their European military bureaucratic puppets in Brussels) have been bereft of reasons for existence. They started by expanding, like a dieing red giant star, growing and growing, sucking the life out of others, while rotting internally non-the-less. The Anglos pushed NATO into the Yugoslav civil wars, wars that can be argued were started with soft power interventions by the members of NATO, in the first place.

However this was short lived, thus the God send of the War on Terror. It was a God send on three accounts:

1. It allowed NATO to continue to justify its existence to the majority of its members, even as the Anglo-Sphere's drive towards destruction of Russia, never stopped. Many of the other members of NATO were less then happy with this hidden agenda, but the terror of 11 September and other incidents, allowed them to look the other way and continue to support the Frankenstein in their midst.

2. It allowed continued expansion of NATO and NATO partnership programs, most of whom seem to have happened to be the countries on Russia's periphery.

3. It allowed America and to a lesser extent, the UK lap dogs, to continue building on the one industry that America still has a monopoly on: weapons systems. NATO runs on, first and foremost, American weapons and like the Soviet Union of old, the only real industries America still has is weapons and heavy equipment. It is a power that can not fully cloth its people, can not provide them with furniture to sit on or even a television to watch. It can not sustain itself with oil and gas and it can not even finance itself without every third world hell hole being a creditor to the world's best armed pauper state.

So, seeing all this, it was no surprise that the Anglo-Sphere, with the rest of NATO in toe, rushed into Afghanistan, the biggest Western folly since the 1940s.

Of course, with the usual Anglo-Sphere ideology driving every endeavor, two things have developed that have firmly put NATO's future in Russia's hands and will in the end destroy the last best chance for Anglo-Sphere domination of Europe and Asia:

1. Pakistan. Not satisfied with only a half controlled vassal, in the form of Masheriff, the Anglos brought about the end of his reign and placed on the throne a gaggle of true puppets. Inexplicably, in the year that has followed, Pakistan has hurtled towards an absolute collapse and with it the main supply route to NATO's legions in Afghanistan. Inadvertently, NATO is now absolutely dependent on Russia for the supply of its forces.

While, the ability to move forces, particularly personnel, by air, will preclude the NATO legions facing the fate of the First British Expedition to Afghanistan, the images of NATO forces abandoning equipment and scrambling to get out of a cut off, land locked and over run Afghanistan, will absolutely spell the doom of NATO. It will be a moral blow no less deadly to the present system then the fall of Berlin was to National Socialism.

2. Georgia. The NATO backed genocidal dictatorial regime that launched yet another bought of genocide against its minorities and was slapped down by Russia, has continued to hold power. Beyond all reason, NATO has continued to back the dictator, declaring his opposition as radicals. True some are, but the majority are from Monarchistic, Republican, Conservative and Christian Democratic parties. These are now radicals? People who call on the government to allow media freedom, an economy free of government terror and black mail and an end to effective one party rule, are now, to the Anglo-Sphere and their European NATO lackeys, a radical movement. But then again, the constitutionalist Ron Paul was called a radical in America. Why should anyone be surprised.

As such, NATO has continued to quickly rearm the Georgians and to prop them up in Georgia's blind hope to regain its former territories and, as goes unmentioned in the absolutely controlled Anglo press, exterminate those peoples who live there. Of course Georgia will launch its war and of course the weight of Russia will crush it, again, and will not stop, this time, until Tbilisi.

NATO's reaction will lead to one of two ends, neither good for it or its Anglo masters: it will either do nothing, the more likely effect, and finish off the coffin on any confidence in would-be vassal states surrounding Russia. Or, if has truly gone insane, always a distinct possibility, it will react militarily. Not only will large scale casualties result in this, but Russia will instantly close off all routes to Afghanistan and will be in an equally powerful position to make an air rescue extremely difficult at best and impossible at worst.

Either way, NATO has its head firmly in the Russian noose and is busy spitting in the Russian eye, non-the-less. Yet, ignoring this most obvious truth, NATO continues to treat with Russia on a basis of: What is ours is ours and what is yours is negotiable but eventually will be ours.

Pakistan's Imminent Demise, Another DC Ideologue Screwup

Pakistan, a nation of 150 million people, thirty odd nukes and delivery systems and the holder of the main supply corridor to Afghanistan, is about to collapse both economically and politically and yet again, this is the fault of DC.

As far as catastrophes go, this one is a big one. With the government absolutely bankrupt, with no cash on hand, begging a silent world; with Islamic attacks increasing; with the political and military elites fractured and with thirty nuclear warheads up for grabs any day, this is about as bad as it gets.

How of course did the world get to a point where hard line Islamic militias may soon become nuclear powers?

It all started with the Pervez Musharraf overthrew his predecessor, the region breathed a sigh of relief at the ouster of the most corrupt and brutal of Pakistan's historical brutal and corrupt leaders. Even Benazir Bhutto did not go as far in her absolute corruption and thuggery. Regardless, a military dictator, Musharraf for 9 years managed to hold Pakistan together and even grow the economy while holding some amount of constraint on the Taliban and other hard line Islamics.

However, as the War or rather Farce on Terror ground on, to the DCrats, Musharraf seemed to be not a robust and strong enough leader. In other words, he was not an absolute lap dog but tried to do what is best for his own nation to maintain some sense of stability and growth. This was irrelevant of course, since DC only understands allies to mean lapdogs and well disciplined lap dogs...just ask the British..woof.

Thus the PR Misters of DC and London set off to over thrown this ill trained pooch called Musharraf. They, with their slavish Fourth Estate, recreated the opposition of Pakistan into pristine angels of Democracy. Marxists have a tendency of doing such things to the truth. Bhutto was made the poster child, her absolute brutality and corruption a thing of non-existence in the 24/7 wag the dog world of US/UK "news". This continued right through her assassination, where she received more news and praise than the passing Mother Teresa (as a side note, the misguided and narcissistic West gave Princess Diana more praise than Mother Teresa, too).

The new government that was elected on Western funding and PR was that of Bhutto's widower, Asif Ali Zardari, another brutal thug, but a well trained one at that. The very people who elected him over Musharraf, were back in the street, a month later, demanding his head and for good reason. Outside of reneging on many of his promises(such as reinstating the constitutional judges), Zardari is an absolute DC lapdog and thus now highly unpopular with the majority of Pakistanies.

Of course Bush decided to help Zadari's popularity. He did this by authorizing cross border, none approved, attacks into Pakistan against the militias. Of course civilian casualties have occurred
and now even moderate Pakistanies are calling for Zadari's head.

Add to this the final ingredient of the, yet again US/UK made, Bank Panic of 2008, and we have a problem, one that could mean the deaths of millions in Pakistan and the surrounding region and millions more if any of those nukes are set off in a Western city.

On a more immediate scale, a collapse of the Pakistani state would not only free up more Taliban to fight NATO forces in neighboring Afghanistan, but it would close down the main air/land artery in keeping Afghanistan with bullets and beans. The only other option is through the north and Russia is already pissed off.

If Pakistan goes, than it is up to India to move first and do something about those nukes. Now that's critical for India, a likely Pakistani target, more so even than for the rest of the world.

Either way, however, this crisis is the work of DC, just like so many around the modern world.

Afghanistan the Lost

To say that the regimes running the Axis of Hypocrisy (US/UK) are fools is to insult and undermine the credibility of fools. To say they are blind, ignorant and high on their own self worth, is closer to reality.

In one more brilliant move, the Axis has doomed some 60,000 NATO troops to go the way of the first British Expeditionary Force to Afghanistan....in short, to extermination. Afghanistan is a land locked country and there are only two routes to reach it, the direct southern route, through Pakistan and the air route through Russia and Central Asia. One is now closed and the second is in jeopardy.

Pakistan, when it agreed upon US supply, was under Masherof, a dictator but a US ally. Through ideological stupidity of the Trotskyte Neocons (remarkably similar to Soviet stupidity while under the Leninist-Trotskytes itself) the US has pushed for "democracy" in Pakistan. The results have been the eviction of the Masherof and the replacement with a pseudo coalition that has one thing in common between all parties: a hatred of the US. This new government has been waiting for any excuse to cut the route through the Khyber Pass.

The US, in the grand fashion of the past 17 years, provided one in short order. US forces, chasing Taliban fighters, crossed the border and attacked a village in Pakistan. Civilian casualties, though the number are disputed between 20 and 0 (zero being the US number), were inflicted. But even if there were no civilians killed, Pakistan has been invaded. True, this is not the first time, but in previous times Masherof, the US ally, ignored these raids. In truth these continued raids helped lead to his ouster. Not caring about the niceties of diplomacy, the Axis Regimes, marched on and attacked.

As of yesterday, Pakistan has cut off the border. That's right, no more supplies and heavy equipment through the south. If the US/UK are lucky, Pakistan will not (with China's aid) start to actively arm the Taliban past their light weapons.

Now comes the other route: Russia and Central Asia. When Russia opened up the area to US use for Afghanistan, the US immediately started to try and push regime change and permanently rip away Central Asia from Russia. These for the most part failed and the US lost a key airbase (Uzbekistan) and had to more than double the payments on a smaller one (Kyrgyzstan and that was a revolution that succeeded). After that the Regimes of Fools, backed off.

Recently they even concluded a deal for heavy Russian transports to move US/NATO equipment to and from Afghanistan. That dead along with that entire route, is now in danger of closure, all thanks to the mindlessness of Bush, Cheney and Brown (sounds like a bad law firm) and their support of the mass murderer Saakashvili, Eater of Ties, Killer of Babies.

Cheney's little trip around the region, last week, all but declared war on Russia and was greeted as just that. Not only will America now not have a ride for US astronauts to space but also for US equipment to Afghanistan.

If I were any of the non US/UK NATO members with troops in Afghanistan, I would be seriously contemplating a fast negotiations with Russia to extradite my forces out of their before the Axis of Hypocrisy (US/UK) screws things up any worse and thus condemns those soldiers to follow the path of the British Imperial Army in Afghanistan...a path to legend and extermination.